Netronome vs Speedtest Tracker
Pros and cons
Each app's own strengths and weaknesses, plus the specs where Netronome and Speedtest Tracker differ.
Netronome
Pros
- Three speed test engines
- Traceroute and packet loss monitors
- DNS resolver monitors
- Agents report CPU and bandwidth
- Shareable public dashboard
Cons
- Premium themes need a license
- SATA temperatures need root agent
- Config generated before first run
Speedtest Tracker
Pros
- Alerts when speed drops below thresholds
- Long history with dashboard charts
- Scheduled tests on your own cron
- Public dashboard for guests
- Completely free
Cons
- Most notification channels now deprecated
- Thresholds only set during install
- Client only, cannot act as a test server
Netronome vs Speedtest Tracker: specs side by side
Every spec for both apps in one table. Values in bold are where one app has the edge, and amber ones are worth a second look before you install.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free + Paid | Advantage: Free |
| Licence | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Install options | Docker + Binary · Linux packages | Docker only |
| Web UI | Yes | Yes |
| Architecture | x86 + ARM | x86 + ARM |
| Containers | 1The app alone | 1The app alone |
| Database | SQLite | SQLite / MySQL / PostgreSQL |
| Runtime | Go | PHP |
Updated