CryptPad vs HedgeDoc

Pros and cons

Each app's own strengths and weaknesses, plus the specs where CryptPad and HedgeDoc differ.

CryptPad

Pros

  • Encrypted in the browser
  • Docs, sheets, slides, forms and boards
  • Guest links without accounts
  • Free to self-host

Cons

  • Two domains recommended
  • No native mobile apps
  • Office editing needs OnlyOffice

HedgeDoc

Pros

  • Live multiplayer markdown editing
  • Slides, diagrams and formulas
  • A permission level per note
  • LDAP, OAuth2 and SAML logins
  • Revision history with restore

Cons

  • No PDF export in version 1
  • HedgeDoc 2 still in development
  • No official mobile app

CryptPad vs HedgeDoc: specs side by side

Every spec for both apps in one table. Values in bold are where one app has the edge, and amber ones are worth a second look before you install.

Spec
PriceFree + PaidAdvantage: Free
LicenceAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
Install optionsDocker + LinuxDocker + Node.js
Web UIYesYes
Architecturex86 + ARMx86 + ARM
Stated minimum2 cores · 2 GB RAM · 20 GBNot stated
Containers1The app alone2Plus Postgres
Databasefile onlyPostgres
RuntimeNode.jsNode.js

Updated