RSS-Bridge vs RSSHub
Pros and cons
Each app's own strengths and weaknesses, plus the specs where RSS-Bridge and RSSHub differ.
RSS-Bridge
Pros
- Hundreds of ready-made bridges
- Atom, JSON, MRSS and plaintext output
- Cache backends soften repeated requests
- Whitelist decides which bridges appear
- Single container or a plain PHP folder
Cons
- Bridges break when a site changes
- Feeds only, no reading interface
- Private instances need a token in the URL
RSSHub
Pros
- Routes for many sites
- Optional headless-browser routes
- Optional Redis caching
- Built-in access key
Cons
- Some routes need cookies
- Chromium routes use more resources
- Anti-crawler sites need proxy
RSS-Bridge vs RSSHub: specs side by side
Every spec for both apps in one table. Values in bold are where one app has the edge, and amber ones are worth a second look before you install.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Licence | Unlicense | AGPL-3.0 |
| Install options | Docker + PHP | Docker + Kubernetes · Linux |
| Web UI | Yes | – |
| Architecture | x86 + ARM | x86 + ARM |
| Containers | 1The app alone | 3Plus Chromium, Redis |
| Database | none | Redis |
| Runtime | PHP | Node.js |
Updated